A Study for Different Methodologies and Reduction Techniques of Building Noise

Authors

  • Pramod Kumar  Mechanical Engineering, Ideal Institute of Technology, Palghal, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Building Noise, Reduction technique

Abstract

The vitality utilization in the building part can reach up to 40% of the aggregate vitality request of a modern nation. Therefore, green building procedures can be amazingly successful to the extent petroleum products reserve funds and ozone depleting substances diminishment. Manageable materials can assume an imperative part, since less vitality is for the most part required for their generation than the one required for ordinary materials. Individuals appeared to be more tolerant of conditions the more control open doors - switches, blinds and opening windows, for example - were accessible to them. This is a fundamental finding to take from spearheading warm solace inquire about and is the reason for what later came to be called 'versatile solace hypothesis'. Individuals are all the more sympathetic of uneasiness on the off chance that they have some powerful methods for control over mitigating it. Nevertheless, numerous advanced structures appear to have the exact inverse impact. The route that in Europe various Municipalities have conveyed into Building Regulations specific recommendations to upgrade their use in new improvements, allowing a diminishment of advancement charges or distinctive focal points, exhibits their essentialness. The paper displays an invigorated investigation of the qualities and the acoustical properties of plausible materials for upheaval control and particularly strong ingestion coefficient.

References

  1. C. M. Harris, Handbook of noise control, McGraw-Hill, pp. 1-1, 1957.
  2. H. Kuttruff, Acoustics-an introduction, Taylor & Francis, pp. 287–289-309–310, 2007.
  3. M. Van den Berg, "Neighbour noise: a rational approach", Proceedings of the 2nd WHO International Housing and Health Symposium, pp. 151-154, 2004.
  4. B. Rasmussen, M. Machimbarrena, COST Action TU0901-Towards a common framework in building acoustics throughout Europe. COST Office, pp. 26-28, 2013.
  5. "Acoustical requirements", ISO 6242-3: 1992 Building construction-Expression of users' requirements-Part, vol. 3.
  6. COST Action 0901, 2014, online] Available: http://www.costtu0901.eu/.
  7. ISO 140 Acoustics-Measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements all parts.
  8. ISO 10140 Acoustics-Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements all parts.
  9. B. Rasmussen, J. H. Rindel, "Sound insulation between dwellings-Descriptors applied in building regulations in Europe", Appl. Acoust, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 171-180, 2010.
  10. B. Rasmussen, "Sound insulation between dwellings–Requirements in building regulations in Europe", Appl. Acoust, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 373-385, 2010.
  11. SRPS U.J6.201: 0990 Akustika u gradarstvu-Tehniki uslovi za projektovanje i gradenje zgrada.
  12. ISO 717-1: 2013 Acoustics-Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements-Part 1: Airborne sound insulation.
  13. ISO 16717-1: 2012 Acoustics-Evaluation of sound insulation spectra by single-numbers-Part 1: Airborne sound insulation.
  14. H. K. Park, J. S. Bradley, "Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance loudness and audibility ratings", J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 208-219, 2009.
  15. E. Gerretsen, "Calculation of airborne and impact sound insulation between dwellings", Appl. Acoust, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 245-264, 1986.
  16. E. Gerretsen, "Calculation of the sound transmission between dwellings by partitions and flanking structures", Appl. Acoust, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 413-433, 1979.
  17. E. Gerretsen, "European developments in prediction models for building acoustics", Acta Acust, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 205-214, 1994.
  18. ISO/DIS 12354-1: 2000 Building acoustics-Estimation of acoustic performance of buildings from the performance of elements-Part 1: Airborne sound insulation between rooms.
  19. J. Alba, J. Venero, R. Del Rey, J. Ramis Soriano, E. Escuder, R. Gavalda, "In situ measurements of the structural reverberation time of several brick walls", Proceedings of ICA 2007, 2007.
  20. D. B. Pedersen, "Estimation of vibration attenuation through junctions of building structures", Appl. Acoust, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 285-305, 1995.
  21. M. Schneider, H-M. Fischer, M. Weimer, "Vibration reduction index of ‘real’ junctions", Proceedings of Forum Acusticum 2011, 2011.
  22. A. Schiavi, A. Astolfi, "The prediction of the vibration reduction index Kij for brick and concrete rigid junctions", Appl. Acoust, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 523-530, 2010.
  23. C. Crispin, C. Mertens, M. Blasco, B. Ingelaere, M. Van Damme, D. Wuyts, "The vibration reduction index Kif laboratory measurements versus predictions EN 12354-1 (2000)", Proceedings of Internoise 2004, 2004.
  24. H. A. Metzen, "Accuracy of CEN-prediction models applied to German building situations", Building Acoustics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 325-340, 1994.
  25. D. B. Pedersen, "Evaluation of EN 12354 part 1 and 2 for Nordic Dwelling Houses", Building Acoustics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 259-268, 1999.
  26. R. J. M. Craik, "The contribution of long flanking paths to sound transmission in buildings", Appl. Acoust, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 29-46, 2001.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 3, March-April-2018

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Pramod Kumar, " A Study for Different Methodologies and Reduction Techniques of Building Noise , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.1146-1152, March-April-2018.