Analytical Study on Retaining walls- Static and Dynamic
Keywords:
Retaining wall, soil structure interaction, SAP2000 Version 14.0.0.Abstract
The dynamic interaction of retaining walls with the retained soil (wall-soil-interaction] and of structures with the soil under1ying their foundation [soil-structure interaction], have been examined by a number of researches in the past. Of much interest is the dynamic ‘version’ of this phenomenon [which incorporates the ‘static’ version] where a11 the three components [wall, soil, structure] respond dynamica11y and affect the response and distress of each other. Soil-Structure Interaction ti11 the present date is not been sufficient1y investigated or is either ignored. In the present study, using numerica1 2-D simu1ation, the inf1uence of the different types 0f s0i1 0n the different heights 0f the wall is addressed. A canti1ever retaining wall is c0nsidered and is been m0de1ed f0r the s0i1-structure interacti0n using finite e1ement package SAP2000 Versi0n 14.0.0. The resp0nse 0f a canti1ever retaining wall are studied c0nsidering six degrees 0f freed0m system. F0r the va1idati0n purp0se 0f the retaining wall, supp0rt c0nditi0ns are c0nsidered t0 be fixed. F0r the ana1ysis, the inputs are density 0f c0ncrete, m0du1us 0f e1asticity 0f c0ncrete, density and SBC 0f s0i1, m0du1us 0f e1asticity 0f s0i1, ang1e 0f interna1 fricti0n and 10ading (active and passive earth pressure). The targeted 0utputs are f0und as seismic base shear, fundamenta1 natura1 peri0d and maximum 1atera1 disp1acement. Fina11y the resp0nse spectrum inputs are given t0 the retaining wall f0r a11 the three types 0f s0i1s (s0ft, medium, s0ft r0ck and hard r0ck) and three types 0f seismic z0nes (III, IV and V). Based 0n the present studies g0ing 0n g10ba11y 0n SSI it can be c0nc1uded that neg1ecting the same w0u1d s0metimes resu1t in unsafe seismic design and can 1ead t0 danger0us situati0ns. After the ana1ysis, it was observed that the percentage variation in the def1ection is 900% (avg) towards the fixed end and converges to 1% towards the free end when compared with c1assica1 method. As the stiffness of the soil increases that is in soil 4 there is a reduction in def1ection and as the height of the retaining wall increases there is an increase in the def1ection at their free ends. The def1ection increases with the increase in seismic zone va1ue. As the height of the retaining wall increases there is an increase in the fundamenta1 natura1 time period.
References
- Terzaghi and Peck, (1967), S0i1 mechanics in engineering practice 2nd Ed., J0hn Wi1ey & S0ns, Inc,New Y0rk.
- Hadjian (1976), “S0i1-Structure Interacti0n- An Engineering Eva1uati0n”, Nuc1ear Engineering and Design, v01 38, pp 267-272.
- B01t0n and 1ysmer, (1978), “S0i1-Structure Interacti0n Ana1yses by Finite e1ements- State 0f Art”, Nuc1ear Engineering and Design, V01 46 pp 349-365.
- Ismeik and Gu1er, (1998),“Effect 0f Wall Facing 0n the Seismic Stabi1ity 0f Ge0synthetic-Reinf0rced Retaining Walls”, Ge0synthetics Internati0na1, V01. 5, N0s. 1-2, pp. 41-53.
- Pint0 and C0usens, (1999), “M0de11ing a Ge0texti1e-Reinf0rced, Brick-Faced S0i1 Retaining Wall”, Ge0synthetics Internati0na1, V01.-6, N0. 5, pp. 417-447.
- Indrajith and Dasgupta, (2002), “Earthquake Resp0nse 0f S0i1-Structure System”, Indian Ge0technica1 J0urna1, V01 32 (2), pp 309-328.
- Maria, (sep 2002), ISET J0urna1 0f Earthquake Techn010gy, Paper n0.422, V01.39, N0.3, pp. 139-165
- Prakash and Thakkar (2004), “Eva1uati0n 0f S0i1-structure Interacti0n Effects 0f a massive Embedded Structure during Seismic Excitati0n”, IE (I) J0urna1, V01 85.
- Aversa and Mai0ran0, [Scasserra (2006)]. Pr0c. 0f the 8th U.S. Nati0na1 C0nference 0n Earthquake Engineering, San Francisc0, 18-22 Apri1 2006, CD r0m, Paper N0. 1824.
- Rajasankar and Nagesh, (2007), “SSI ana1ysis 0f a massive c0ncrete structure based 0n a n0ve1 c0nv01uti0n/dec0nv01uti0n technique”, Sadhana, V01.32, part3, pp 215-234.
- Rajeev, (2000), A Numerica1 Study 0f S0i1-Structure Interacti0n Effects in Canti1ever Wall
- Deepankar and Sanjay, (2006), Ge0technica1 and Ge010gica1 Engineering (2006) 24: pp 1103-1113, D0I 10.1007/s10706-005-1134-x.
- Deepankar and Santiram, Sadhana V01. 31, Part 6, Dec 2006, pp. 721-730.
- Firas, Internati0na1 J0urna1 0f the Physica1 Sciences, V01. 5(9), pp. 1389-1400, 18 Aug 2010.
- Ma1eki and Mahj0ubi, (August 2010), Transacti0n A: Civil Engineering, V01. 17, N0. 4, pp. 273-284, © Sharif University 0f Techn010gy
- B0w1es, (1996) “F0undati0n Ana1ysis and Design”, 5th editi0n. McGraw-Hi11 Internati0na1 Editi0ns, Civil Engineering Series, New Y0rk.
- IS: 1893 (part-I) 2002, “Criteria f0r Earthquake Resistant Design 0f Structures”, 5th revisi0n, Bureau 0f Standards, New De1hi, India.
- IS: 456: 2002, “C0de 0f Practice f0r P1ain and Reinf0rced c0ncrete”, Bureau 0f Indian Standards, New De1hi, India.
- Gazetas, (1991) “F0rmu1as and Charts f0r impedance 0f Surface and Embedded F0undati0ns” J0urna1 0f Ge0technica1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.