Tracking Challenges in Online Social Environment using Deep Learning Techniques

Authors

  • R. Ramya  Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, A.V.C College of Engineering, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dr. S. Kannan  Professor, Department of CSE, E.G.S Pillay Engineering College, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT228121

Keywords:

Event Prediction, Artificial Intelligence, Topic Modeling, Wavelet Transformation, Fractal Neural Networks

Abstract

Social network event prediction is much more important task in many of the applications like medical, security, etc. With fast-growing technology, People spent most of the time in Social Networks. They can express their views and opinions in social network community. The main reason behind this phenomenon happens to be the ability of online community. It can provide a platform for users to connect with their family, friends, and colleagues. The information shared in social network and media spreads very fast, which makes it attractive for attackers to gain information. However, event prediction is a more complex task because it is challenging to classify, contains temporally changing the concept of discussion and heavy topic drifts learning. In this research, we present to addresses the challenge of accurately representing relational features is observed from complex social communication network behavior for the event prediction task. In this, graph learning methodologies are more complex to implement. Here the concept gives, to learn the complex statistical patterns of relational state transitions between actors preceding an event and then, to evaluate these profile findings temporally. The event prediction model which leverages on the RFT framework discovers, identifies and adaptively ranks relational occurrence as most likelihood predictions of event in social network communities. Most extensive experiments on large-scale social datasets across important indicator tests for validation. It shows that the RFT framework performs comparably better by Hybrid Probabilistic Markovian (HPM) predictive method. Deep learning relational models appear to have considerable potential, especially in the fast growing area of social network communities. This study opens the door to precise prediction events in spatio-temporal phenomena, adding a new tool to the data science revolution. Also, Social network analysis software has many algorithms for graph features data has been collected.

References

  1. Leonard Tan, Thuan Pham, Hang Kei Ho And Tan Seng Kok, “Event Prediction In Online Social Networks “ in  Journal of Data Intelligence,2021, Vol. 2, No. 1, 064–094
  2. L. Tan, T. Pham, H. K. Ho, and T. S. Kok,“Discovering relational intelligence in online social networks,” in International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer, 2020, pp. 339–353.
  3. G. Amodeo, R. Blanco, and U. Brefeld, “Hybrid models for future event prediction,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2011, pp. 1981–1984.
  4. G. M. Weiss and H. Hirsh, “Event prediction: learning from ambiguous examples,” in Working Notes of the NIPS9298 Workshop on Learning from Ambiguous and Complex Examples, 1998.
  5. Y. Yang, T. Pierce, and J. Carbonell, “A study of retrospective and on-line event detection,” in Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 1998, pp. 28–36.
  6. M. Cordeiro and J. Gama, “Online social networks event detection: a survey,” in Solving Large Scale Learning Tasks. Challenges and Algorithms. Springer, 2016, pp. 1–41.
  7.  X. Dong, D. Mavroeidis, F. Calabrese, and P. Frossard, “Multiscale event detection in social media,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1374–1405, 2015.
  8. K. Feng, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and T. Guo, “Finding attribute-aware similar regions for data analysis,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1414–1426, 2019.
  9. X. Huang, Q. Song, Y. Li, and X. Hu, “Graph recurrent networks with attributed random walks,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2019, pp. 732–740.
  10. S. Deng, H. Rangwala, and Y. Ning, “Learning dynamic context graphs for predicting social events,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2019, pp. 1007–1016.
  11. L. Zhao, J. Wang, and X. Guo, “Distant-supervision of heterogeneous multitask learning for social event forecasting with multilingual indicators.” in AAAI, 2018, pp. 4498–4505.
  12. L. Zhao, Q. Sun, J. Ye, F. Chen, C.-T. Lu, and N. Ramakrishnan, “Multi-task learning for spatiotemporal event forecasting,” in Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2015, pp. 1503–1512.
  13. Y. Ning, R. Tao, C. K. Reddy, H. Rangwala, J. C. Starz, and N. Ramakrishnan, “Staple: Spatiotemporal precursor learning for event forecasting,” in Proceedings of the 2018 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 2018, pp. 99–107.
  14. X. Zhang, L. Zhao, A. P. Boedihardjo, C.-T. Lu, and N. Ramakrishnan, “Spatiotemporal event forecasting from incomplete hyper-local price data,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2017, pp. 507–516.
  15. F. Atefeh and W. Khreich, “A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter,” Computational 92 Event Prediction in Online Social Networks Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 132–164, 2015.
  16. D. Knights, M. C. Mozer, and N. Nicolov, “Detecting topic drift with compound topic models.” in ICWSM, 2009. 16. L. K. Knobloch and J. A. Theiss, “Relational turbulence theory applied to the transition from deployment to reintegration,” Journal of Family Theory & Review, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 535–549, 2018.
  17. S. C. Hoi, D. Sahoo, J. Lu, and P. Zhao, “Online learning: A comprehensive survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02871, 2018.
  18. D. H. Solomon and L. K. Knobloch, “Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 804–820, 2001.
  19. D. H. Solomon, L. K. Knobloch, J. A. Theiss, and R. M. McLaren, “Relational turbulence theory: Variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships,” Human Communication Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 507–532, 2016.
  20. K.-I. Goh, G. Salvi, B. Kahng, and D. Kim, “Skeleton and fractal scaling in complex networks,” Physical review letters, vol. 96, no. 1, p. 018701, 2006.
  21. G. Larsson, M. Maire, and G. Shakhnarovich, “Fractalnet: Ultra-deep neural networks without residuals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07648, 2016.
  22. K. Choi, G. Fazekas, M. Sandler, and K. Cho, “Convolutional recurrent neural networks for music classification,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2392–2396.
  23. S. Petrovic, “Real-time event detection in massive streams,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1374–1405, 2013.
  24. H.-O. Peitgen, H. J¨urgens, and D. Saupe, Chaos and fractals: new frontiers of science. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
  25. D. H. Solomon and J. A. Theiss, “A longitudinal test of the relational turbulence model of romantic relationship development,” Personal Relationships, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 339–357, 2008.
  26. R. M. McLaren, D. H. Solomon, and J. S. Priem, “The effect of relationship characteristics and relational communication on experiences of hurt from romantic partners,” Journal of Communication, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 950–971, 2012.
  27. W. Wilmot, J. Hocker, J. Arthur, J. W. Petty, J. J. Martocchio, H. R. Cheeseman, E. Biech, and R. J. Rosania, Interpersonal Conflict 9th Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2007.
  28. D. H. Solomon and J. A. Samp, “Power and problem appraisal: Perceptual foundations of the chilling effect in dating relationships,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 191–209, 1998.
  29. C. A. Surra, “Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship type,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–33, 1987.
  30. L. A. Baxter and G. Pittman, “Communicatively remembering turning points of relational development in heterosexual romantic relationships,” Communication Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2001.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February-2022

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
R. Ramya, Dr. S. Kannan, " Tracking Challenges in Online Social Environment using Deep Learning Techniques, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp.162-170, January-February-2022. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT228121