Investigating the Accuracy of Forecasting Travel Duration for Uber Trips and Analyzing the Influence of Weather on Traffic Flow

Authors

  • Shubbh R. Mewada  Department of Computer Engineering, SAL Institute of Technology and Engineering Research (Gujarat Technological University), Gujarat, India.
  • Fagun N. Patel  Department of Computer Engineering, SAL Institute of Technology and Engineering Research (Gujarat Technological University), Gujarat, India.
  • Sheshang Degadwala  Associate Professor and Head of Department, Department of Computer Engineering, Sigma University, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT2139028

Keywords:

Data Types, Uber Movement Dataset, Machine Learning

Abstract

Accurately predicting the travel time between two destinations is an essential aspect of traffic monitoring and facilitating ridesharing services. However, this is a highly complex and challenging task, which involves a multitude of variables that cannot be resolved straightforwardly. Previous studies on travel time prediction have focused on evaluating the duration of individual road segments or specific sub-paths before integrating the necessary time for each sub-path. While this method may provide some insight, it may result in an incorrect or imprecise time estimate. To address this issue, this research aims to utilize machine learning techniques to predict the duration of trips in ride-sharing networks, by utilizing the Uber movement dataset. The proposed system employs Python programming to calculate the distance between the pickup and drop-off locations. Furthermore, the study explores the various factors that affect travel time in a descriptive analysis. This includes examining the impact of traffic congestion, weather conditions, and road construction on travel time. The suggested approach incorporates a robust regression model known as Huber regression to enhance the accuracy of trip duration prediction and increase the precision of the algorithm. The Huber regression model is robust to outliers, making it suitable for the Uber movement dataset, which may contain unexpected and extreme values. The dataset is processed using k-fold cross-validation, which splits the dataset into k subsets, with each subset used for validation once while the remaining subsets used for training the model. However, this approach presents several challenges that need to be addressed, including the difficulties with tracking variables, the need for extensive data transformation due to the diverse data types contained in the dataset, and the challenge of handling unlabeled places during the segmentation of geographical data. Additionally, outliers in the dataset can lead to substantial data differences and affect the model's accuracy. Data normalization is slow due to the time-consuming nature of reading duplicated information. To mitigate these issues, additional study is required to improve the model's layout and address the challenges of working with the Uber movement dataset.

References

  1. Bahman, 2021. Predicting Short-Term Uber Demand Using Spatio-Temporal Modeling: A New York City Case Study, s.l.: Arxiv.org..
  2. Beck, 2017. The R-Squared: Some Straight Talk, s.l.: Cambridge University Press..
  3. Biau, 2012. Analysis of a Random Forests Model. Journal of Machine Learning Research. Journal of Machine Learning Research , Volume 10, pp. 1-33.
  4. Boyer, 2012. Robust fitting of mixture regression models.. Computational Statistics And Data Analysis, Volume 56, pp. 2347-2359.
  5. Breiman, 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning volume, Volume 45, pp. 5-32.
  6. Carson-Bell, 2021. Demand Prediction of Ride-Hailing Pick-Up Location Using Ensemble Learning Methods.. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Volume 11, pp. 1-15.
  7. Chai, 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?.. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Volume 1, pp. 1-7.
  8. Chao, 2019. Modeling and Analysis of Uber’s Rider Pricing. s.l., Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2019).
  9. Chao, 2019. Modeling and Analysis of Uber’s Rider Pricing.. s.l., Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2019)..
  10. Chen, 2007. Enhanced recursive feature elimination.. s.l., Machine Learning and Applications.
  11. Coakley, 1993. A bounded influence, high breakdown, efficient regression estimator.. Journal of American Statistical Association, Volume 88, pp. 872-880.
  12. Cohen, 2016. USING BIG DATA TO ESTIMATE CONSUMER SURPLUS: THE CASE OF UBER. s.l., NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH..
  13. Darapureddy, 2019. Research of Machine Learning Algorithms.. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), Volume 8, pp. 1-4.
  14. Darapureddy, 2019. Research of Machine Learning Algorithms.. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), Volume 8, pp. 1-4.
  15. Edelman, 2017. Improving the Prediction of Total Surgical Procedure Time Using Linear Regression Modeling, s.l.: Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care.
  16. Faghih, 2015. Predicting Short-Term Uber Demand Using Spatio-Temporal Modeling: A New York City Case Study, s.l.: Cornell University..
  17. Fuchs, 1999. An inverse problem approach to robust regression.. IEEE, pp. 1-11.
  18. Horton, 2021. Pricing in Designed Markets:The Case of Ride-Sharing, s.l.: Uber Technologies..
  19. Hulu, 2020. Analysis of Performance Cross Validation Method and K-Nearest Neighbor in Classification Data. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(4), pp. 1-5.
  20. Kennard, 1969. Computer Aided Design of Experiments.. Technometrics, 11(1), pp. 137-148.
  21. Kim, 2021. Self-Supervised Keypoint Detection Based on Multi-Layer Random Forest Regressor.. IEEE, 4(1), pp. 1-7.
  22. Maass, 2020. Street-level Travel-time Estimation via Aggregated Uber Data.. ResearchGate, pp. 1-6.
  23. Probst, 2018. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinformatics, p. 270.
  24. Saptoro, 2020. A Modified Kennard-Stone Algorithm for Optimal Division of Data for Developing Artificial Neural Network Models.. Semantic Scholar, pp. 12-30.
  25. Sharma, 2021. A Knowledge Based Travel Time Prediction using Regression Technique. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology , 6(7), pp. 1-4.
  26. Shokoohyar, 2020. Bahman, 2021. Predicting Short-Term Uber Demand Using Spatio-Temporal Modeling: A New York City Case Study, s.l.: Arxiv.org.. ResearchGate, pp. 1-11.
  27. Shokoohyar, 2020. Travel Time Prediction in Ride-Sourcing Networks: A Case Study for Machine Learning Applications.. ResearchGate, pp. 1-11.
  28. Tang, 2009. Cross-Validation. Springer, pp. 1-8.
  29. Uyanık, 2013. A Study on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 106, pp. 234-240.
  30. Wang, 2015. Adaptive estimation for varying coefficient models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, pp. 17-31.
  31. West, 2016. Simple random sampling of individual items in the absence of a sampling frame that lists the individuals.. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, pp. 1-10.
  32. Wu, 2003. Travel time prediction with support vector regression. s.l., Intelligent Transportation Systems IEEE.
  33. Yadav, 2016. Analysis of k-Fold Cross-Validation over Hold-Out Validation on Colossal Datasets for Quality Classification.. IEEE, pp. 1-8.
  34. Yang, 2010. A review of ensemble methods in bioinformatics. Current Bioinformatics , 5(4), pp. 296-308.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Shubbh R. Mewada, Fagun N. Patel, Sheshang Degadwala, " Investigating the Accuracy of Forecasting Travel Duration for Uber Trips and Analyzing the Influence of Weather on Traffic Flow, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp.233-244, March-April-2023. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2139028