Transparency and Privacy the Role of Explainable AI and Federated Learning in Financial Fraud Detection

Authors

  • P. Srihari B. Tech Student, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, Tirupati, Tirupati (D.t), Andhra Pradesh, India Author
  • Dr. Swathi Ramesh Head of Department, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, Tirupati, Tirupati (D.t), Andhra Pradesh, India Author

Keywords:

Fraud Detection for Financial Assets, Decision Tree, Random Forest, GBMs, DNN, RNN, SGD

Abstract

Originally, in the domain of financial fraud detection, relevance and applicability of Explainable AI (XAI) and Federated Learning (FL) provides a novel concept to mitigate the issues of opaque models and privacy breaches. This project uses the geographic data set from Kaggle called Paysim1 for testing the authenticity of the transaction focusing more on fraudulent activities. The existing system mainly incorporates DNN, RNN, and SGD but did not place much emphasis on Trust-aware Machine Learning. These methods are informative, nevertheless, they usually are not interpretable and it is necessary to save data in a centralized manner, which leads to privacy issues and model interpretability. On the other hand, the proposed system includes Decision Trees, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Machines. The algorithms included are chosen because of their stability, and ease of interpretability and accuracy in data of high dimensionality. Moreover, Federated Learning is employed to realize privacy since training occurs on multiple decentralized devices but not the raw data. This approach ensures the privacy of the data whilst at the same time providing an environment for learning that enhances the training of the fraud detection models. Explainable AI and Federated Learning are proposed to address the main challenge of developing transparent and privacy- preserving solutions in the context of financial fraud detection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. N. Ashtiani and B. Raahemi, “Intelligent Fraud Detection in Financial Statements Using Machine Learning and Data Mining: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 72504–72525, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2021.3096799.

A. A. Almazroi and N. Ayub, “Online Payment Fraud Detection Model Using Machine Learning Techniques,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 137188–137203, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339226.

Y. Tang and Z. Liu, “A Distributed Knowledge Distillation Framework for Financial Fraud Detection Based on Transformer,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 62899–62911, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387841.

W. Xiuguo and D. Shengyong, “An Analysis on Financial Statement Fraud Detection for Chinese Listed Companies Using Deep Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, p p . 2 2 5 1 6 – 2 2 5 3 2 , 2 0 2 2 , d o i : 1 0 . 1 1 0 9 / ACCESS.2022.3153478.

H. Zhou, G. Sun, S. Fu, L. Wang, J. Hu, and Y. Gao, “Internet Financial Fraud Detection Based on a Distributed Big Data Approach with Node2vec,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 43378–43386, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2021.3062467.

R. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Ma, D. Yang, and S. Sun, “Internet Financial Fraud Detection Based on Graph Learning,” IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1394–1401, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3189368.

R. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Ma, D. Yang, and S. Sun, “Internet Financial Fraud Detection Based on Graph Learning,” IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1394–1401, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3189368.

A. U. Usman, S. B. Abdullahi, Y. Liping, B. Alghofaily, A. S. Almasoud, and A. Rehman, “Financial Fraud Detection Using Value-at-Risk With Machine Learning in Skewed Data,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 64285–64299, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3393154.

J. Nicholls, A. Kuppa, and N. A. Le-Khac, “Financial cybercrime: A comprehensive survey of deep learning approaches to tackle the evolving financial crime landscape,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 163965–163986, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134076.

C. Wang, M. Wang, X. Wang, L. Zhang, and Y. Long, “Multi-Relational Graph Representation Learning for Financial Statement Fraud Detection,” Big Data Mining and Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 920–941, 2024, doi: 10.26599/ BDMA.2024.9020013.

Y. Xie, G. Liu, C. Yan, C. Jiang, M. Zhou, and M. Li, “Learning Transactional Behavioral Representations for Credit Card Fraud Detection,” IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 5735–5748, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3208967.

T. T. H. Le, H. Yeonjeong, H. Kang, and H. Kim, “Robust Credit Card Fraud Detection Based on Efficient Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Models,” IEEE Access, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3485200.

A. Tudisco et al., “Evaluating the Computational Advantages of the Variational Quantum Circuit Model in Financial Fraud Detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 1 0 2 9 1 8 – 1 0 2 9 4 0 , 2 0 2 4 , d o i : 1 0 . 1 1 0 9 / ACCESS.2024.3432312.

M. Adil, Z. Yinjun, M. M. Jamjoom, and Z. Ullah, “OptDevNet: A Optimized Deep Event-based Network Framework for Credit Card Fraud Detection,” IEEE Access, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3458944.

T. Awosika, R. M. Shukla, and B. Pranggono, “Transparency and Privacy: The Role of Explainable AI and Federated Learning in Financial Fraud Detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 64551–64560, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2024.3394528.

E. Ileberi, Y. Sun, and Z. Wang, “Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Credit Card Fraud Detection Using SMOTE and AdaBoost,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 165286–165294, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2021.3134330.

Downloads

Published

15-11-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 231

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.